[CWG-Stewardship] Financing the new IANA

[Seun Ojedeji]

I am 100% in agreement with this statement.

Cheers!

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at gmail.com>
wrote:

> A couple of three things.
>
> The principle of how the function is funded is established; those who
> ultimately use the service funds the service delivery.  But IMHO, this
> argument has moved from what of the very small piece of the IANA function -
> purely oversight and the role played thusly by the NTIA - to a totally
> independent-of-ICANN IANA Functions operator.
>
> My sense of the room is that the question of moment for most is not just a
> IANA functions oversight provider but the confguration of an independent
> [of ICANN] IANA functions operator.
>
> Current funding process - from collection to receipt thru utilisation -
> has ICANN in the middle. Assuring an independent IANA functions provider
> means re-engineering that process flow.
>
> -Carlton
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 6:39 AM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>
> wrote:
>
>>  Apologies crossed wires!
>>
>>  I don’t think there is any concern over the registries and registrars
>> funding a new IANA entity but rather if that funding came via ICANN rather
>> than directly to the new entity.
>> Not from my perspective in any case, open to other points of view from
>> the various communities.
>>
>>  - James
>>
>>  On 26 Oct 2014, at 04:05, Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  And my question:  Where does IANA’s money come from now.  My
>> understanding is that the NTIA’s only role is oversight - not funding.  If
>> that is the case, then industry (registries/registrars) already fund IANA
>> functions - so the call for IANA functions to remain cost free is simply an
>> extension of the present situation (without NTIA oversight).  Any
>> corrections welcome.
>>
>>  HOlly
>>
>>  On 26 Oct 2014, at 6:23 am, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  I think that funding an impartial public service via a privately
>> interested stakeholder without introducing allegations/impressions of
>> influence or control would be close to impossible.
>> Thus an alternative funding model for an independent IANA entity, should
>> that be the option chosen, must be considered and be discussed.
>>
>>  -James
>>
>>  On 25 Oct 2014, at 19:55, Christopher Wilkinson <
>> lists at christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote:
>>
>>  2. All the IANA services must remain cost-free to the final user. There
>> must be no question of charging for specific services, notably amendments
>> of the Root Zone.
>>    ICANN already has more than ample resources to ensure that the
>> present and future IANA is fully funded on a public service basis, as at
>> presen
>>
>>
>>   _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------





*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*

The key to understanding is humility - my view !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141026/1fd48655/attachment.html>