[CWG-Stewardship] [IANA-issues] CWG RFP 2C - Draft Triage of IANA Functions Contract

[Marika Konings]

Dear All,

The documents have also been uploaded to the wiki (see
https://community.icann.org/x/DyrxAg). If there are no further volunteers,
we¹ll go ahead and create a separate email list (publicly archived) for this
effort with the names currently listed on the wiki page.

Best regards,

Marika

From:  Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray at cira.ca>
Date:  Friday 24 October 2014 22:14
To:  "cwg-stewardship at icann.org" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Cc:  Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel at icann.org>, Marika Konings
<marika.konings at icann.org>, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>
Subject:  [CWG-Stewardship] [IANA-issues] CWG RFP 2C - Draft Triage of IANA
Functions Contract 

Please find attached an initial draft of the triage of the IANA functions
contract as discussed on the CWG call this week.
 
The first document is the draft Triage itself, organized as per our meeting
this week.  In the second I have pasted the provisions that I have brought
together all of the provisions that I categorized as ³Likely Needs
Improving²  and ³Linked to Accountability and Oversight².   I know that a
number of you, including Chuck Gomes, Kris Seeburn, Greg Shatan, James
Gannon, Guru Acharya, Mary Uduma, Wanawit Ahkuputra, and Pitinan
Kooarmornpatana have all volunteered to work on this.  Thank you.  I have
sent the drafts to the full list as I do not have all of your emails.  Could
I ask that anyone who has already volunteered, or anyone that wishes to do
so now, to respond quickly to this email so that we might start a CWG RFP2C
list.  
 
I invite you to review the current draft documents.  I am hoping that this
can be done in the documents themselves.  But if the comments and changes
become too cumbersome, I will ask Bart or Marika to suggest how we can deal
with these.  In closing let me make a general comment.  I see the objective
of this exercise as being to identify potential issues that will need to be
addressed at some point.  I do not, however, see the resolution of these
issues as being part of this SWG¹s work.  Rather I see its objective as
being to inform the work of the other SWG¹s, RFP3 in particular.
 
Regards
 
Allan 
 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141027/4a14fd88/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5076 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141027/4a14fd88/smime.p7s>