[CWG-Stewardship] [IANA-issues] Fwd: Names Community vs the other two communities

[Guru Acharya]

Milton: I agree that changing the IANA operator is a technical decision and
not a policy decision; however there are contingent policy issues that may
arise due to this technical decision - such as jurisdiction of the new IANA
operator, financing of the new IANA operator - where GAC/ALAC participation
may be beneficial.

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

>    In my opinion, while "day to day oversight" is technical/operational;
> any "major review oversight" will involve policy issues.
>
>
>
> It depends on what you mean  by “policy issues.”  I would disagree that
> the choice of an IANA operator is a way to make global policy for the DNS.
> What you call “major review oversight” is, I think, nothing more than the
> power to change the IANA functions operator.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141030/7b3373e2/attachment.html>