[CWG-Stewardship] FW: Responding to Olivier

[Milton L Mueller]

Olivier, and all the +1-ers, are ignoring the point that was made about the risks of circumventing or vetoing community policy by politicizing the operational and technical functions via this kind of ‘oversight’

Would you care to address this, please?


From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Tracy Hackshaw @ Google
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 9:54 PM
To: Lindeberg, Elise; Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: Responding to Olivier

+1

Sent from BlackBerry Q10
From: Lindeberg, Elise
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 8:02 PM
To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond; cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: Responding to Olivier


+ 1

Elise

Fra: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] På vegne av Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
Sendt: 29. oktober 2014 19:16
Til: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Emne: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: Responding to Olivier

Dear Becky,

thanks for detailing the various functions and going to depth showing none of the functions involve policy. To be frank, I am somehow baffled as to why end users would only be interested in policy and not operations.
On 29/10/2014 17:45, Becky Burr wrote:
Again, to be clear, I am not unalterably opposed to having other parts of the community participate, but I don’t understand why they would want to.

It's that set of eyes. End users would feel a lot happier if they could watch... and warn.
Kind regards,

Olivier


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141030/26e5b8b4/attachment.html>