[CWG-Stewardship] [IANA-issues] Fwd: Names Community vs the other two communities

[Donna Austin]

Guru

My understanding of the contingent policy issues you identify are taken into account by IANA in their review of any delegation/redelegation requests.

Thanks,

Donna

[Description: Description: Description: ARI Logo]DONNA AUSTIN
Policy and Industry Affairs Manager

ARI REGISTRY SERVICES
Melbourne | Los Angeles
P  +1 310 890 9655
P  +61 3 9866 3710
E  donna.austin at ariservices.com<mailto:donna.austin at ariservices.com>
W  www.ariservices.com<http://www.ariservices.com/>

Follow us on Twitter<https://twitter.com/ARIservices>

The information contained in this communication is intended for the named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately.

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Guru Acharya
Sent: Wednesday, 29 October 2014 2:11 PM
To: Milton L Mueller
Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] [IANA-issues] Fwd: Names Community vs the other two communities

Milton: I agree that changing the IANA operator is a technical decision and not a policy decision; however there are contingent policy issues that may arise due to this technical decision - such as jurisdiction of the new IANA operator, financing of the new IANA operator - where GAC/ALAC participation may be beneficial.

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu<mailto:mueller at syr.edu>> wrote:
In my opinion, while "day to day oversight" is technical/operational; any "major review oversight" will involve policy issues.

It depends on what you mean  by “policy issues.”  I would disagree that the choice of an IANA operator is a way to make global policy for the DNS. What you call “major review oversight” is, I think, nothing more than the power to change the IANA functions operator.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141030/67dace69/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3765 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141030/67dace69/image001-0001.png>