[CWG-Stewardship] [IANA-issues] Fwd: Names Community vs the other two communities

[Guru Acharya]

Donna. I dont think policy issues arising as a result of delegation and
redelegation of TLDs are the same as the policy issues arising as a result
of contracting a new IANA operator. We're talking about C.7.3 from the IANA
Functions Contract.

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Donna Austin <Donna.Austin at ariservices.com>
wrote:

>  Guru
>
>
>
> My understanding of the contingent policy issues you identify are taken
> into account by IANA in their review of any delegation/redelegation
> requests.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Donna
>
>
>
> [image: Description: Description: Description: ARI Logo]*D**ONNA AUSTIN*
> Policy and Industry Affairs Manager
>
>
>
> *ARI REGISTRY SERVICES*
> Melbourne *|* Los Angeles
> *P*  +1 310 890 9655
> *P*  +61 3 9866 3710
> *E*  donna.austin at ariservices.com
> *W*  www.ariservices.com
>
>
>
> *Follow us on **Twitter* <https://twitter.com/ARIservices>
>
>
>
> *The information contained in this communication is intended for the named
> recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally
> privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended
> recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance
> on it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all
> copies from your system and notify us immediately.*
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Guru Acharya
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 29 October 2014 2:11 PM
> *To:* Milton L Mueller
> *Cc:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] [IANA-issues] Fwd: Names Community vs
> the other two communities
>
>
>
> Milton: I agree that changing the IANA operator is a technical decision
> and not a policy decision; however there are contingent policy issues that
> may arise due to this technical decision - such as jurisdiction of the new
> IANA operator, financing of the new IANA operator - where GAC/ALAC
> participation may be beneficial.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
>
> In my opinion, while "day to day oversight" is technical/operational; any
> "major review oversight" will involve policy issues.
>
>
>
> It depends on what you mean  by “policy issues.”  I would disagree that
> the choice of an IANA operator is a way to make global policy for the DNS.
> What you call “major review oversight” is, I think, nothing more than the
> power to change the IANA functions operator.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141030/53b8d90d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3765 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141030/53b8d90d/image001-0001.png>