[CWG-Stewardship] FW: Responding to Olivier

[Burr, Becky]

I think that Chuck’s suggestion (that this issue should be deferred until some of the other sections have been filled out) makes sense.  At that point the community will be able to see in concrete terms what’s on the table and decide for themselves whether or not they can/want to participate


J. Beckwith Burr
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  / becky.burr at neustar.biz<mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz> / www.neustar.biz

From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 at 11:05 PM
To: "Tracy Hackshaw @ Google" <tracyhackshaw at gmail.com<mailto:tracyhackshaw at gmail.com>>
Cc: "cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>>, "Lindeberg, Elise" <elise.lindeberg at npt.no<mailto:elise.lindeberg at npt.no>>
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: Responding to Olivier

 "I am not unalterably opposed to having other parts of the community participate, but I don’t understand why they would want to."

I think that should be a subject of discussion with and between the "other parts of the community." If some of these other parts don't wish to participate that is one thing.  However, we should not be pushing them (us) away from participation -- it could be misinterpreted as sort of "Move along, nothing to see here folks..."  (which often means just the opposite).

Greg

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Tracy Hackshaw @ Google <tracyhackshaw at gmail.com<mailto:tracyhackshaw at gmail.com>> wrote:
+1

Sent from BlackBerry Q10
From: Lindeberg, Elise
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 8:02 PM
To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond; cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: Responding to Olivier


+ 1

Elise

Fra:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] På vegne av Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
Sendt: 29. oktober 2014 19:16
Til: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Emne: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: Responding to Olivier

Dear Becky,

thanks for detailing the various functions and going to depth showing none of the functions involve policy. To be frank, I am somehow baffled as to why end users would only be interested in policy and not operations.
On 29/10/2014 17:45, Becky Burr wrote:
Again, to be clear, I am not unalterably opposed to having other parts of the community participate, but I don’t understand why they would want to.

It's that set of eyes. End users would feel a lot happier if they could watch... and warn.
Kind regards,

Olivier


_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_cwg-2Dstewardship&d=AAMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=VfZWB1gYJcxqD5PKhWPpv-9MiKk8vaJKmpKNGkAbhtA&s=uk1tHVWQXH8eIsYCx_WpvuThgVFcgF00DNij6LOQwPM&e=>

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_cwg-2Dstewardship&d=AAMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=VfZWB1gYJcxqD5PKhWPpv-9MiKk8vaJKmpKNGkAbhtA&s=uk1tHVWQXH8eIsYCx_WpvuThgVFcgF00DNij6LOQwPM&e=>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141030/584f86fc/attachment-0001.html>