[CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III

[James Gannon]

I agree, google docs allows us to collaborate easier but the drafts belong on a more controlled platform.

-James

On 30 Oct 2014, at 19:12, Tracy Hackshaw @ Google <tracyhackshaw at gmail.com<mailto:tracyhackshaw at gmail.com>> wrote:

This approach suggested by Amr sounds optimal.

/t

Sent from BlackBerry Q10
From: Amr Elsadr
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:09 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III


Hi,

Thanks Grace, and thanks Allan for bringing this up.

Would a combination of Google Docs and the Wiki be acceptable? Perhaps use Google Docs for collaborative drafting, then use the Wiki to post drafted documents and eliciting feedback from the broader community? The combination of the two had been previously suggested.

Thanks again.

Amr

On Oct 30, 2014, at 7:54 PM, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org<mailto:grace.abuhamad at icann.org>> wrote:

Hi Allan,

I'm no Marika, but I can provide the answer to your first point. We have checked with our web team internally and the Wiki was the suggested tool. We created sub-team sections in the Wiki for that purpose, and could of course adjust them to what best suits the group for collaborative work. The other option would be something like Google Docs, which I could support you in, but is not a platform supported by the ICANN web team.



From: Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray at cira.ca<mailto:allan.macgillivray at cira.ca>>
Date: Thursday, October 30, 2014 2:37 PM
To: "cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>>
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III

Colleagues – we are quickly running out of time, Group III has to get its act together, and quickly.  This is what I think we need right away:

1.       A platform for collaboration
We need a place specific proposals can be uploaded which has the capability of capturing the comments of the community all in one place.  Marika – can you suggest something.  My fear is that a lot of what is being said on the list will have to be repeated
Marika – can you suggest something?
2.       A common understanding of what we are trying to achieve.

Many of the ideas that are being floated may be based on differing assumptions as to the objective. This has to be a priority for putting up in our ‘collaboration space’

3.       Specific Proposals from Group III participants

We need fleshed out proposals that can be reviewed and commented on in a structured manner.  I propose that we use a simple ‘pro and con’ approach.

4.        Someone to call the first meeting

Whoever you are, you will likely end up as the rapporteur/coordinator unless you can convince someone else to do it but unless someone volunteers, we will not accomplish anything




_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship


_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141030/a12973d4/attachment-0001.html>