[CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III

[Greg Shatan]

That approach sounds good to me as well.

Greg

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:11 PM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>
wrote:

>  I agree, google docs allows us to collaborate easier but the drafts
> belong on a more controlled platform.
>
>  -James
>
>  On 30 Oct 2014, at 19:12, Tracy Hackshaw @ Google <
> tracyhackshaw at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   This approach suggested by Amr sounds optimal.
>
>  /t
>
>  Sent from BlackBerry Q10
>    *From: *Amr Elsadr
> *Sent: *Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:09 PM
> *To: *cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject: *Re: [CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III
>
>  Hi,
>
>  Thanks Grace, and thanks Allan for bringing this up.
>
>  Would a combination of Google Docs and the Wiki be acceptable? Perhaps
> use Google Docs for collaborative drafting, then use the Wiki to post
> drafted documents and eliciting feedback from the broader community? The
> combination of the two had been previously suggested.
>
>  Thanks again.
>
>  Amr
>
>  On Oct 30, 2014, at 7:54 PM, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
> wrote:
>
>  Hi Allan,
>
>  I'm no Marika, but I can provide the answer to your first point. We have
> checked with our web team internally and the Wiki was the suggested tool.
> We created sub-team sections in the Wiki for that purpose, and could of
> course adjust them to what best suits the group for collaborative work. The
> other option would be something like Google Docs, which I could support you
> in, but is not a platform supported by the ICANN web team.
>
>
>
>   From: Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray at cira.ca>
> Date: Thursday, October 30, 2014 2:37 PM
> To: "cwg-stewardship at icann.org" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] TIME TO GET GOING RPC GROUP III
>
>    Colleagues – we are quickly running out of time, Group III has to get
> its act together, and quickly.  This is what I think we need right away:
>
> 1.       *A platform for collaboration*
>
> We need a place specific proposals can be uploaded which has the
> capability of capturing the comments of the community all in one place.
> Marika – can you suggest something.  My fear is that a lot of what is being
> said on the list will have to be repeated
>
> *Marika – can you suggest something?*
>  2.       *A common understanding of what we are trying to achieve*.
>
>  Many of the ideas that are being floated may be based on differing
> assumptions as to the objective. This has to be a priority for putting up
> in our ‘collaboration space’
>
>  3.       *Specific Proposals from Group III participants*
>
>  We need fleshed out proposals that can be reviewed and commented on in a
> structured manner.  I propose that we use a simple ‘pro and con’ approach.
>
>  4.        *Someone to call the first meeting*
>
>  Whoever you are, you will likely end up as the rapporteur/coordinator
> unless you can convince someone else to do it but unless someone
> volunteers, we will not accomplish anything
>
>
>
>
>
>   _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141031/9ccd8702/attachment-0001.html>