[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA DT-C Meeting #5 | 02 April
Brenda Brewer
brenda.brewer at icann.org
Thu Apr 2 19:39:13 UTC 2015
Dear all,
The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA DT-C Meeting #5 - 2 April are available here:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52895501
Action Items
ACTION: Bernie, as DT-A staff lead, will take this issue to DT-A
ACTION: Determine what expertise may be required to sit on CSC
Notes
Discussion of CWG Call 2 Apr:
- presentation/status of Design Teams
- mention of relationship of DT-C with DT-M
- Template for DT output
- DT-C Development of Charter
- DTs due on 10 Apr, High Intensity work on 13,14 Apr
1) DT-A IANA SLE
- Discussion of DT-A SLE documentation and understand input from IANA
- DT-A Standalone work? Discussion with IANA for any agreed upon SLAs
- Is DT-A the negotiator for SLAs? Should be result of negotiation between RyOs and IANA
- Assumption that future SLAs negotiated between CSC and IANA
- DT-A should perhaps include content on how future Service Levels be addressed; Current DT-C report
does have content on how to address Service Levels going forward;
ACTION: Bernie, as DT-A staff lead, will take this issue to DT-A
2) DT-M Escalation
- Keep what we have - CWC and IANA in cases of remediation
- Three parallel processes; will be included in proposal
- 1st process - Emergency
- 2nd process Customer Svc Complain Process
- 3rd escalation to CSC
- Specify in detail the triggers for escalation
- Reference to Kurts work, ID of triggers is more detailed; illustrative and negotiated with IANA as
to how that would work.
- CSC version will take escalation to a certain point; if CSC believes of poor performance
- Two process overlapping; 1) something gone wrong 2) service complaint resolution process (CSC
mediating) 3) escalation, but not to whom, but CSC used as a mediator; Issue with committee of four
worthy people having to perform mediation is a big task.
- Remedial action is missing (Annex Z, point 1) - Ensure DT-M, this is not a part of CSC. CSC be
made aware of the issue; provide instruction and plan to be delivered within "x" timeframe.
- Assuming CSC is minimal organization; purely technical ops; still might require effort to handle
escalations
- Still unclear if there will be an MRT
- Caution as to not to tailor task to fit organization. If CSC not a part of escalation, then where
it will it go?
- MB vision of CSC day to day monitoring process; if threshold breach, would alert ccNSO/GNSO as
necessary. Use the SOs to trigger certain
accountability mechanisms.
3) DT-N Periodic Review of IANA Function
- DT-N has not really started; 1st meeting will be scheduled early next week
- SD to integrate DT-C concepts into DT-N where appropriate
- DT-N assumption that it will be a multi-stakholder body that would cover the review
- How should review team be formed and constituted?
- Concern - CSC primary role to monitor performance; unsure if CSC will be well equipped to do that
from a resourcing perspective & work output perspective. This effort is yet to be sized. Periodic
review could be significant amount of work; MB agrees that CSC not perform peridoc review
- Role of CSC provides information, perhaps into AoC type of review process that could be
multi-stakeholder; flag as way forwards; SF agrees with approach; some piece of the periodic reviews
does need to be MS.
4) DT-C Document:
- DT-C to develop Charter; seeking appropriate template
- Should include bit on how escalation process flows through CSC
- Discussion of Changes in latest version
ACTION: Determine what expertise may be required to sit on CSC
Final draft for Monday, call on Tuesday to wrap it up.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150402/04fc0c38/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150402/04fc0c38/image001-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5035 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150402/04fc0c38/smime-0001.p7s>
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list