[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, recordings and transcript for DT-O Meeting 3 April
Brenda Brewer
brenda.brewer at icann.org
Fri Apr 3 19:01:20 UTC 2015
Dear all,
The notes, recordings and transcripts for the DT-O Meeting on 03 April are available here:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52895337
Action Items
Action (Chuck): send draft text list or Grace for inclusion in latest version
Action (Grace): relay budget issue to DT-L.
Outstanding Actions
Action (James): need citation to contract requirement for budget separation
---> Can someone volunteer to take over this action in James' absence? Thanks Cheryl!
Notes
DT-O meeting #2 | 3 April at 13:00 UTC
Outstanding Actions
Action (James): need citation to contract requirement for budget separation
---> Can someone volunteer to take over this action in James' absence? Thanks Cheryl!
Completed Actions:
* Action (Grace): Transfer DT-O request for Finance staff member to join next DT-O cal
* Action (Marika): edit the document and send around clean/redlined version
* Action (Grace): look at email exchange between Chuck and James and pull questions for
Finance
* Action (Brenda): Doodle poll for Thursday and Friday this week and next week (to select 2
or 3 meetings before 10 April. Please do 30 min intervals so that we can try to find at least one 90
min call slot.
Notes:
Mary on audio-only
This meeting is focused on edits on scoping document by section:
Background / Current State
Contract requires IANA services to be separated from policy..
COMPLETE (Cheryl): go through the contract for a citation
--> The Contract is silent on the question of budget separation
Edit the text to reflect the community expectations
Issues Identified & Rationale for Changes, if any
DT will consider all the current estimated information available as part of the approved FY15 and
draft FY16 budget
Do not include itemization of FY15 and FY16 in the issues section (leave it in the recommendations
section)
--> Note that feasibility of itemization will be something for Finance to discuss.
Edit: ..."outcomes from DT-O may be found useful to contribute to submissions to the comments on
budget"
If DT-O drafts comments for budget, it would be after 10 April (after the deadline for DT work to be
submitted)
Whether the DT-O or the CWG makes budget comments, we'll cross that bridge when/if we get there
Add a note about submitting outcome to CCWG in Issues section
Proposed Recommendations
No edits to #1
#2 and #3 have been removed. why? because they pre-suppose an outcome. How do we address this?
Edit: keep #2 and #3 but reword to include as future work of DT-O after the CWG and ICG have decided
on a solution and proposal.
Edit to #4
Action (Chuck): send draft text list or Grace for inclusion in latest version
Add a #1 that recommends that all IANA costs be fully transparent (high level point)
Budget breaks down to different levels
* Strategic Objectives
* Goals
* Portfolios
* Projects
Action (Grace): relay budget issue to DT-L.
Next Call: Monday, 06 April 19:00 - 20:30 UTC
Kind Regards,
Brenda
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150403/7d5c6fbf/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150403/7d5c6fbf/image001-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5035 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150403/7d5c6fbf/smime-0001.p7s>
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list