[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, recordings and transcript for DT-O Meeting 3 April

[Gomes, Chuck]

This meeting is a good illustration that WG meetings can be fun and productive.

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Brenda Brewer
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 3:01 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Notes, recordings and transcript for DT-O Meeting 3 April


Dear all,

The notes, recordings and transcripts for the DT-O Meeting on 03 April are available here:   https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52895337
Action Items

Action (Chuck): send draft text list or Grace for inclusion in latest version

Action (Grace): relay budget issue to DT-L.

Outstanding Actions

Action (James): need citation to contract requirement for budget separation
---> Can someone volunteer to take over this action in James' absence? Thanks Cheryl!
Notes

DT-O meeting #2 | 3 April at 13:00 UTC

Outstanding Actions

Action (James): need citation to contract requirement for budget separation

---> Can someone volunteer to take over this action in James' absence? Thanks Cheryl!

Completed Actions:
*        Action (Grace): Transfer DT-O request for Finance staff member to join next DT-O cal
*        Action (Marika): edit the document and send around clean/redlined version
*        Action (Grace): look at email exchange between Chuck and James and pull questions for Finance
*        Action (Brenda): Doodle poll for Thursday and Friday this week and next week (to select 2 or 3 meetings before 10 April. Please do 30 min intervals so that we can try to find at least one 90 min call slot.

Notes:

Mary on audio-only

This meeting is focused on edits on scoping document by section:

Background / Current State

Contract requires IANA services to be separated from policy..

COMPLETE (Cheryl): go through the contract for a citation

--> The Contract is silent on the question of budget separation

Edit the text to reflect the community expectations

Issues Identified & Rationale for Changes, if any

DT will consider all the current estimated information available as part of the approved FY15 and draft FY16 budget

Do not include itemization of FY15 and FY16 in the issues section (leave it in the recommendations section)

--> Note that feasibility of itemization will be something for Finance to discuss.

Edit: ..."outcomes from DT-O may be found useful to contribute to submissions to the comments on budget"

If DT-O drafts comments for budget, it would be after 10 April (after the deadline for DT work to be submitted)

Whether the DT-O or the CWG makes budget comments, we'll cross that bridge when/if we get there

Add a note about submitting outcome to CCWG in Issues section

Proposed Recommendations

No edits to #1

#2 and #3 have been removed. why? because they pre-suppose an outcome. How do we address this?

Edit: keep #2 and #3 but reword to include as future work of DT-O after the CWG and ICG have decided on a solution and proposal.

Edit to #4

Action (Chuck): send draft text list or Grace for inclusion in latest version

Add a #1 that recommends that all IANA costs be fully transparent (high level point)

Budget breaks down to different levels
*        Strategic Objectives
*        Goals
*        Portfolios
*        Projects

Action (Grace): relay budget issue to DT-L.

Next Call: Monday, 06 April 19:00 - 20:30 UTC


Kind Regards,
Brenda

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150403/19e3b82a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: image002.gif
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150403/19e3b82a/image002-0001.gif>