[CWG-Stewardship] Initial Discussion Draft on Transition Models

[Seun Ojedeji]

Thanks Lise,

A quick observation; the legal separation option does not seem to included
advantages/disadvantages like the functional separation. Secondly there may
be need to clarify the expected role of CSC to the legal firm as it seem
CSC in their proposal would have direct interaction up to ICANN board level
(based on the notion that CSC will operate in the same manner as described
in legal separation). Certainly, PRF necessity/composition is something
that needs to be looked into in details (especially if ccwg comes up with a
PRF like group).
Overall I think it's a good writeup with signs of light at the end of the
tunnel...the functional separation at the moment is looking more like that
light.

Thanks!

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.

Dear All,



Please see the attached initial discussion draft of the two models from our
legal counsel. The draft is based on the requested input on:  the internal
accountability/hybrid model with two closely related variants:
accountability mechanism with legal separation and accountability mechanism
with functional separation.



Be aware that it has not been discussed with the legal committee yet, this
is planned later this week. Please read it with this in mind.



Best regards,



Jonathan & Lise



_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150406/251d53a4/attachment.html>