[CWG-Stewardship] FW: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related Functions

Wed Apr 8 18:27:27 UTC 2015

Forwarding on behalf of the Chairs. This is posted to the CWG Wiki here:
https://community.icann.org/x/kyEnAw

Apologies for the delay. There is a CRISP call today at 20:00 UTC. There
call is open to silent observers:
> Join WebEx meeting
> <https://ripencc.webex.com/ripencc/j.php?MTID=m9a21de42cf3b6330390d4f0824c1886
> f> 
> https://ripencc.webex.com/ripencc/j.php?MTID=m9a21de42cf3b6330390d4f0824c1886f
> Meeting number:700 520 727
> Meeting password:crisp
>  
> 
> Fra: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info]
> Sendt: 6. april 2015 10:57
> Til: 'Izumi Okutani'; 'Lise Fuhr'
> Cc: 'Alan Barrett'
> Emne: RE: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related
> Functions
>  
> Dear Izumi,
>  
> Thank-you for this letter and for the brief follow-up discussion in person in
> Istanbul. 
>  
> The CWG-Stewardship meeting in Istanbul was comprehensive and productive.
> Lise and I chose to wait until after this meeting to respond to your note
> because we wanted to share with you the outcome of this meeting. In our
> Chairs¹ Statement <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-03-29-en> ,
> you will see that the group made significant progress on both the operational
> and structural components of the names proposal, through the Design Team
> working methodology and retention of independent legal counsellors.
>  
> In terms of our timeline, we have moved our public comment launch date to 20
> April, with a final submission to the ICG anticipated for the ICANN 53 meeting
> in Buenos Aires. We have adjusted our timeline per request by our chartering
> organizations in order that they have enough time to ensure consensus support
> for the names proposal within their respective communities and using their
> specific processes.
>  
> We recognize your concerns regarding the possibility that our proposal might
> affect the numbers community and we are very open to discussions with you and
> the CRISP team in advance of our submission to ICG. However, we have not yet
> finalized a proposal and our legal advisors are working with us to analyse the
> implications of the so called internal model. Therefore, our suggestion at
> this stage is to have a call with you and Alan to give an overview of where we
> are and consider any possible implications for the numbering community.
>  
> We remain available to respond to any questions you or your community may
> have, and appreciate your interest in and support for the names community as
> we all work to achieve a successful IANA Stewardship Transition.
>  
> Best wishes,
>  
>  
> Jonathan and Lise
> CWG-Stewardship Co-Chairs
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Izumi Okutani [mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp]
> Sent: 22 March 2015 04:58
> To: Jonathan Robinson; Lise Fuhr
> Cc: Alan Barrett
> Subject: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related
> Functions
>  
> Dear Jonathan and Lise,
>  
>  
> I am writing to you as Chair of the Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship Proposal
> (CRISP) team, responsible for preparation of the numbers community's response
> to the ICG's Request for Proposals.
>  
> It was helpful to have the update on the CWG for Naming Related Functions
> progress at the session in Singapore, including the revised timeline of the
> process proposed by the CWG-Names, with a CWG-Names proposal submission in
> June later this year. This revised timeline increases the need for
> collaborative and constructive work in the ICG as well as between all three
> stakeholder communities to progress efficiently with the timeline. We remain
> positive that a proposal satisfactory to all parties, can be produced through
> this process.
>  
> The ICG's decision to seek proposals from the three separate affected
> communities reflects the distinct needs, mechanisms and historical development
> of these three communities. At the same time, developing a proposal that
> satisfactorily addresses stewardship of all the IANA functions is a priority
> for all parties.
>  
> With this in mind, I would like to request that the Chairs of the CWG-Names
> communicate directly to the Chair and Vice-Chair of the CRISP team, regarding
> any proposals or developments that might affect the numbers community in
> advance, and not wait for the final submission to the ICG.
>  
> This level of direct communication and collaboration will allow all
> communities to consider the impact and potential compatibility issues among
> the proposals ahead of the ICG consolidation process, consult appropriately
> within their communities, and, if necessary, develop appropriate responses
> efficiently, rather than wait for inputs from the numbers community after the
> ICG consolidates proposal from all the operational communities. Such bottom-up
> consideration by all communities will be essential to the authority and
> success of any final proposal to the NTIA.
>  
> I look forward to hearing of your continued progress, and to work
> collaboratively with you to achieve a successful outcome for all, of the IANA
> Stewardship transition.
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Kind regards,
>  
> Izumi Okutani, Alan Barrett
> CRISP Team Chair, Vice-Chair
> ___________________
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150408/541a4097/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150408/541a4097/smime.p7s>