[CWG-Stewardship] Remember to send questions and comments to legal advice from Sidley Austin

Matthew Shears mshears at cdt.org
Thu Apr 9 20:04:03 UTC 2015


I also think this is what Paul was suggesting.

On 4/9/2015 7:37 PM, Greg Shatan wrote:
> I second what Milton is saying.  I think Paul is proposing essentially 
> an inversion of the Sidley Austin model (and by extension the 
> "Integrated Hybrid Model" or the "Internal Model with Structural 
> Separation").  As I read Paul's suggestion, instead of having the 
> affiliate be the "Post-Transition IANA" (i.e., the IANA Functions 
> operations "in a box"), the affiliate would be the "Post-Transition 
> Oversight/Accountability Mechanism" ("PTOAM"?).  Presumably, this 
> would keep the IANA Functions operations inside of ICANN as a 
> (functionally separated) unit.  The PTOAM would then be much like 
> Contract Co. (although [possibly] "affiliated" with ICANN rather than 
> completely independent).
>
> Greg
>
> *Gregory S. Shatan **ï****Abelman Frayne & Schwab*
>
> *Partner****| IP | Technology | Media | Internet*
>
> *666 Third Avenue | New York, NY 10017-5621*
>
> *Direct*212-885-9253*|**Main*212-949-9022
>
> *Fax*212-949-9190*|**Cell*917-816-6428
>
> */gsshatan at lawabel.com <mailto:gsshatan at lawabel.com>/*
>
> *ICANN-related:/gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>/*
>
> */www.lawabel.com <http://www.lawabel.com/>/*
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu 
> <mailto:mueller at syr.edu>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:58:30PM +0100, Paul M Kane - CWG wrote:
>     > > I would like to specifically ask Sidley to give formal advise
>     on how
>     > > best to ensure an affiliate company (as part of ICANN
>     Community) can
>     > > be the custodian for the Stewardship role currently undertaken
>     by NTIA.
>     >
>     > I thought in the Sidley documents, ICANN was taking the
>     Stewardship role
>     > currently held by NTIA, and PTI does the IANA part, at least if
>     there's an
>     > affiliate company.  Did I misunderstand?
>
>     You did not misunderstand the Sidley-Austin discussion draft. You
>     are, I think, misunderstanding Paul Kane. Paul seems to be asking
>     that the Affiliate be more like the Contract Co.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>     CWG-Stewardship at icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-- 
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 (0)771 247 2987

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150409/ebcd5708/attachment.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list