[CWG-Stewardship] Question for Sidley

[Gomes, Chuck]

Andrew,

I submitted a question to be asked of Sidley before the deadline ending basically asking if there were any legal issues related to this type of scenario.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 7:20 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Question for Sidley

Dear colleagues,

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14:31PM +0000, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> 2) implement it with the clear understanding that we would switch to 
> the legal separation approach in a specified time period (e.g.,
> 12-18 months).  The latter approach would allow plenty of time to do 
> it right while still facilitating a quicker transition.

This is a fetching idea.  What would it take to institute the binding legal regime that would allow us to do the internal model for some defined period and then, if need be, force a new model?  I know this is a little late compared to the desired deadlines, but would it be possible to ask Sidley about this as well?

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship