[CWG-Stewardship] Do we need a DT-X - RFP mechnsims and triggeres

[Greg Shatan]

​I see this as the end game of escalation -- we should see if they are
already dealing with this.

Greg​

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:22:52AM -0400, Avri Doria wrote:
> > - appropriate at this time
>
> Given that we're supposed to release a document for public comment,
> it'd be awfully strange to be working on a major chunk of the proposal
> while it's out for comment, I think.  I agree that it'll seem like a
> pretty big gap in the draft, though.
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150413/741b1975/attachment.html>