[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA Meeting #36 - 13 April

[Brenda Brewer]

Dear all, 

 

The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Meeting #36 on 13 April are available here:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52896578

Action Items

Action (Chairs): submit DT-O recommendations to mailing list for confirmation (no objections). Then,
Chairs 
will submit to Public Comment on Budget & Operating Plan

Action (Paul): send email update today after DT-A call. 

Notes

1. Opening Remarks (including recap)

Worked our way through DT-O, DT-B, DT-N. Agreed to the recommendations of those DTs 

Question from Chuck on whether the CWG should submit public comments or not. 

--> agreement from the group to do this. 

Action (Chairs): submit DT-O recommendations to mailing list for confirmation (no objections). Then,
Chairs will submit to Public 
Comment on Budget & Operating Plan

2. DT-A (SLE) 

IANA has asked the DT-A to amend the workflow chart, and  DT-A has agreed to do so, pending a DIDP
for the workflow chart. 

Action (Paul): send email update today after DT-A call. 

3. DT-C (CSC)

*        Do not believe that the CSC should get involved in individual complaints between registries
and IANA

*        Would it be useful for the CSC to at least be notified or made aware of the complaints? Yes
and that's the case in  document

*        Note that there is a DT-M escalation step that involves CSC, so if CSC does not want to be
involved, DT-M needs an alternative

*        Include text in draft about "mutually agreed timescales"

*        Could CSC be empowered to trigger a ad-hoc/emergency/special review? --> The review could
be triggered at the end of an escalation path 

*        CCWG is building enhanced appeals mechanisms --> issue for DT-M (escalation)

*        DT-N assigned elements to the CSC. Is DT-C ok with these assignments (such as audits, etc).


Conclusions so far: Need for a trigger for the Periodic Review that is outside of the regular 5 year
period. CSC should have a role to play, 
but cannot be the only group to make that decision. 

4. DT-M (Escalation)

CSC is not involved in Phase 1. Proposal for CSC to be informed in Phase 2 and allow for CSC
involvement if desired. ---> currently DT-C does 
not envision the CSC being involved. 

5. AoB  - none

6. Closing Remarks

Three critical actions/issues: 

*        DT-A requirement to close the gap on proposed SLEs, the current IANA SLAs, and to discuss
this with the IANA team for post-transition 

*        DT-C -- does DT-C accept the responsibilities implied in the table of reviews arising from
DT-N

*        DT-M -- does DT-C accept the role proposed for it (by DT-M) in Phase 2 and Problem
Management (Annex Z)? If not, how will this role be handled

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150413/671c8555/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150413/671c8555/image001-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5035 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150413/671c8555/smime-0001.p7s>