[CWG-Stewardship] DT-X RFC Mechanism or work by any other formalism

[Gomes, Chuck]

However this is done, via a new DT or an existing team or another approach, I personally think giving more attention to this would be worthwhile.  The template looks good to me.  Thanks for doing this Avri.

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 4:23 AM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] DT-X RFC Mechanism or work by any other formalism

Hi

Attached is a brief outline of a task definition, done in the form of section III templates.

I understand that we may be past the creation of new DTs, however the real issue is not the formalism we use to get the work done, but that this gap be filled before we submit a report.

The driver doc (open to comments) is at: <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WvBqtgXJ7rNrbN-5Tjf5-gi80aZ2oRYDtF_JLrETRqg/edit?usp=sharing><https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WvBqtgXJ7rNrbN-5Tjf5-gi80aZ2oRYDtF_JLrETRqg/edit?usp=sharing>

avri


________________________________
[Avast logo]<http://www.avast.com/>


This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com<http://www.avast.com/>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150414/9fd0dda3/attachment.html>