[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - Draft Transition Plan V3.2

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I has sent a copy of DT-X Separation Mechanism to the list.  It
certainly needs conversation, but I think that we need to fill this gap
in the proposal before it goes out.

Have included it again with this message.

Perhaps the short  form can sit in III.A.xi  - something like

III.A.xi Separation Mechanism

A fundamental bylaw will be created to define a Separation Mechanism
that can be triggered by the ICANN community if needed.  This would only
occur when other escalation mechanisms and methods have been exhausted.
 A cross community of the SOAC would be formed to review the issues and
make recommendations. The recommendations would need to be approved by
the ICANN Board and would be subject to all escalations and appeals
mechanisms.


There would be no prescribed action for the Separation Mechanism.  It
would be empowered to make a recommendation ranging from “no action
required” to the initiation of an RFP and the recommendation a new IANA
Function Operator. 


avri


On 17-Apr-15 17:58, Marika Konings wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Please find attached for your review the latest version of the
> CWG-Stewardship Transition Proposal. Please note that it is still very
> much work in progress as some key pieces are still missing such as the
> information from the legal memo that is forthcoming, outstanding work
> of the design teams (DT A) as well as final language from ‘DT X’.
> However, we did already want to give you an opportunity to review
> where we are at and as such we would like to encourage you to instead
> of editing the document line by line, to focus on whether there is
> information missing or incorrect, the updated recommendations of some
> of the design teams (e.g. DT M and N) as well as reviewing some of the
> changes we have made for style and consistency purposes to the DT
> recommendations. Note that thanks to Kim Davies a number of
> clarifications have been made to section I and II. 
>
> We are still working on the annexes (focused on consistency and
> readability) as well as formatting and numbering of the overall document. 
>
> As we’ve moved quite some things around in section III to follow a
> more logical order, there is a lot of redline in the document which
> does not necessarily represent new or changed content, but also
> content that has changed position. As such, you will also find
> attached a clean version to facilitate your review. 
>
> Please share any comments you may have (preferably with a reference to
> page number and section) with the mailing list by Monday 23.59 UTC at
> the latest.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150418/6a3cc230/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DT-XSeparationmechanism.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 210373 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150418/6a3cc230/DT-XSeparationmechanism-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DT-XSeparationmechanism.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 9107 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150418/6a3cc230/DT-XSeparationmechanism-0001.docx>