[CWG-Stewardship] [client com] Draft: Summary of Legal Structure for CWG Proposal

Gomes, Chuck cgomes at verisign.com
Sun Apr 19 18:25:29 UTC 2015


Good points Milton.

Chuck

From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu]
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 1:38 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Seun Ojedeji; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] [client com] Draft: Summary of Legal Structure for CWG Proposal



I don't think there is "IANA naming function department" but there is "IANA functions department" So i propose the following:

The IANA naming functions, related administrative staff and resources, processes, data and know-how would be legally transferred into PTI from the exiting "IANA functions department"

MM: Not quite right. It is the entire IANA functions department, not just the naming-related parts of it, that would be transferred to PTI.

The IANA portion of the ICANN budget related to naming would be subject to.......

MM: Again, it makes no sense to keep the other parts of the IANA functions separate from the naming parts. The entire department must be legally separation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150419/b4e3676b/attachment.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list