[CWG-Stewardship] The PTI board

[Brenden Kuerbis]

Hi MM,

I mostly support that approach, but I'd propose the following
modifications. Instead of one naming community representative, I'd suggest
one from the GNSO and one from ccNSO.  In addition, I'd suggest adding the
Exec Dir of the PTI to the board. In total, a lightweight and small five
person board.



-- Brenden

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

>  Regarding the composition of the board, the Summary of Legal Structure
> says only: “The PTI board could be an ICANN-designated board” and that we
> should “avoid the need to replicate the complexity of the multistakeholder
> ICANN board.” I agree with the latter concern, but we will need to flesh
> out more detail regarding the composition of the PTI board.
>
>
>
> I have missed most recent calls, so perhaps this has been discussed
> already, but if it has, it didn’t appear in the Sidley Austin draft.
>
>
>
> I think a simple and easily implementable solution would be to have
> ICANN-designated members be fixed by rules or bylaws (as opposed to wholly
> discretionary).
>
> In my view, the PTI board should consist of the following 3 members:
>
> 1.       The existing IETF liaison on the ICANN board
>
> 2.       Someone designated by the ASO
>
> 3.       Someone designated by ICANN’s board essentially representing the
> naming community. One could add to this a recommendation from the CSC if
> one wanted, I would be amenable to that.
>
>
>
> This PTI board would be balanced across the 3 operational communities and
> thus would be in a good position to provide oversight for the IANA
> functions.
>
>
>
> --MM
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Lise Fuhr
> *Sent:* Monday, April 20, 2015 8:50 AM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Structure and comments from Sidley Austin
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Please be aware of the following documents from Sidley Austin.
>
>
>
> 1.       The structural model diagram
>
> 2.       Summary of Legal Structure
>
> 3.       CWG - Draft Transition Proposal (Sidley Comments)
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lise
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150420/a16e3ff4/attachment-0001.html>