[CWG-Stewardship] The PTI board

[Matthew Shears]

Excellent suggestions.

On 4/20/2015 4:52 PM, Brenden Kuerbis wrote:
> Hi MM,
>
> I mostly support that approach, but I'd propose the following 
> modifications. Instead of one naming community representative, I'd 
> suggest one from the GNSO and one from ccNSO.  In addition, I'd 
> suggest adding the Exec Dir of the PTI to the board. In total, a 
> lightweight and small five person board.
>
>
>
> -- Brenden
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu 
> <mailto:mueller at syr.edu>> wrote:
>
>     Regarding the composition of the board, the Summary of Legal
>     Structure says only: “The PTI board could be an ICANN-designated
>     board” and that we should “avoid the need to replicate the
>     complexity of the multistakeholder ICANN board.” I agree with the
>     latter concern, but we will need to flesh out more detail
>     regarding the composition of the PTI board.
>
>     I have missed most recent calls, so perhaps this has been
>     discussed already, but if it has, it didn’t appear in the Sidley
>     Austin draft.
>
>     I think a simple and easily implementable solution would be to
>     have ICANN-designated members be fixed by rules or bylaws (as
>     opposed to wholly discretionary).
>
>     In my view, the PTI board should consist of the following 3 members:
>
>     1.The existing IETF liaison on the ICANN board
>
>     2.Someone designated by the ASO
>
>     3.Someone designated by ICANN’s board essentially representing the
>     naming community. One could add to this a recommendation from the
>     CSC if one wanted, I would be amenable to that.
>
>     This PTI board would be balanced across the 3 operational
>     communities and thus would be in a good position to provide
>     oversight for the IANA functions.
>
>     --MM
>
>     *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>
>     [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Lise Fuhr
>     *Sent:* Monday, April 20, 2015 8:50 AM
>     *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
>     *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Structure and comments from Sidley Austin
>
>     Dear All,
>
>     Please be aware of the following documents from Sidley Austin.
>
>     1.The structural model diagram
>
>     2.Summary of Legal Structure
>
>     3.CWG - Draft Transition Proposal (Sidley Comments)
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Lise
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-- 
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 (0)771 247 2987

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150420/131ffc1c/attachment.html>