[CWG-Stewardship] The PTI board

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I do not think we should avoid putting some multistakeholder character
in the PTI. 
And still keep it small.

If I understand, so far we have:

PTI Exec Director
IETF laision (are we sure they would agree to this extra level of
participation?
                      We should be cautious assigning roles &
responsibilities to them
                       that they may not wish to have)
RIR liaison (see about re IETF)
GNSO rep
ccNSO rep

I think we should consider  a CSC rep (same caution as above,
                                                                this may
be too operational for the CSC)

I would also recommend

a GAC rep  (government particpation)
an ALAC  (user particpatiion)

and possibly

an ICANN Board rep

If all accepted, that would bring it to 9.
Still a small number.

avri

On 20-Apr-15 11:55, Matthew Shears wrote:
> Excellent suggestions.
>
> On 4/20/2015 4:52 PM, Brenden Kuerbis wrote:
>> Hi MM,
>>
>> I mostly support that approach, but I'd propose the following
>> modifications. Instead of one naming community representative, I'd
>> suggest one from the GNSO and one from ccNSO.  In addition, I'd
>> suggest adding the Exec Dir of the PTI to the board. In total, a
>> lightweight and small five person board.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Brenden
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu
>> <mailto:mueller at syr.edu>> wrote:
>>
>>     Regarding the composition of the board, the Summary of Legal
>>     Structure says only: “The PTI board could be an ICANN-designated
>>     board” and that we should “avoid the need to replicate the
>>     complexity of the multistakeholder ICANN board.” I agree with the
>>     latter concern, but we will need to flesh out more detail
>>     regarding the composition of the PTI board.
>>
>>      
>>
>>     I have missed most recent calls, so perhaps this has been
>>     discussed already, but if it has, it didn’t appear in the Sidley
>>     Austin draft.
>>
>>      
>>
>>     I think a simple and easily implementable solution would be to
>>     have ICANN-designated members be fixed by rules or bylaws (as
>>     opposed to wholly discretionary).  
>>
>>     In my view, the PTI board should consist of the following 3 members:
>>
>>     1.       The existing IETF liaison on the ICANN board
>>
>>     2.       Someone designated by the ASO
>>
>>     3.       Someone designated by ICANN’s board essentially
>>     representing the naming community. One could add to this a
>>     recommendation from the CSC if one wanted, I would be amenable to
>>     that.
>>
>>      
>>
>>     This PTI board would be balanced across the 3 operational
>>     communities and thus would be in a good position to provide
>>     oversight for the IANA functions.
>>
>>      
>>
>>     --MM
>>
>>      
>>
>>     *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>>     <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>
>>     [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>>     <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Lise Fuhr
>>     *Sent:* Monday, April 20, 2015 8:50 AM
>>     *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
>>     *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Structure and comments from Sidley
>>     Austin
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Dear All,
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Please be aware of the following documents from Sidley Austin.
>>
>>      
>>
>>     1.       The structural model diagram
>>
>>     2.       Summary of Legal Structure
>>
>>     3.       CWG - Draft Transition Proposal (Sidley Comments)
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Best regards,
>>
>>     Lise
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
> -- 
> Matthew Shears
> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
> + 44 (0)771 247 2987
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150420/0a2c3fa5/attachment-0001.html>