[CWG-Stewardship] The PTI board

[Avri Doria]

On 20-Apr-15 12:36, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> > an ICANN Board rep
> Since the other appointees are already ICANN board members, why is an
> additional one needed?

while the IETF liaison might already be a ICANN board member, I did not
think any of the others were.

As for the GAC and ALAC.  While the work that IANA can be called
primarily clerical,  the way it does its work, its budget, the degree to
which it responsive, the way it deals with crises &c. are larger issues
and in this multistakeholder environment, just seemed appropriate.

avri




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150420/1d2a37d3/attachment-0001.html>