[CWG-Stewardship] The PTI board

Gomes, Chuck cgomes at verisign.com
Mon Apr 20 20:51:51 UTC 2015


I have trouble accepting this as well.  In my opinion, the PTI board needs to be made up of a few people with the right skill sets to manage a very limited function.  The CSC will oversee performance and the IANA Review Team will serve as the M-S body that deals with big issues including systemic problems.

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 3:09 PM
To: 'avri at acm.org'; 'cwg-stewardship at icann.org'
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] The PTI board

Can't accept this.


I would also recommend

a GAC rep  (government particpation)
an ALAC  (user particpatiion)

and possibly

an ICANN Board rep

If all accepted, that would bring it to 9.
Still a small number.
MM: Not small at all. Bigger than the IANA affiliate. Absurd.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150420/e5b5863d/attachment.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list