[CWG-Stewardship] Structure and comments from Sidley Austin - Periodic Reviews

[Gomes, Chuck]

If I understand the latest charter of the CSC, it would not trigger reviews but would instead escalate to the ccNSO or GNSO.  Is my understanding incorrect?

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Martin Boyle
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 1:35 PM
To: lisefuhrforwader; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Structure and comments from Sidley Austin - Periodic Reviews

Reviewing the text with edits from Sidley I saw on pp48-9 (What should trigger reviews? In annex D) that "although a super-majority of the CSC may also be able trigger an "off-cycle" Periodic Review Function if necessary to ensure satisfactory performance."  Given the small number of members proposed for the CSC, I am not sure this is meaningful!  The DT-C work suggested an escalation to the ccNSO and GNSO for a decision - which would not be unreasonable given their role in organising the periodic reviews) - and a supermajority of the relevant councils makes a lot more sense.

Martin

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lise Fuhr
Sent: 20 April 2015 13:50
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Structure and comments from Sidley Austin

Dear All,

Please be aware of the following documents from Sidley Austin.


1.       The structural model diagram

2.       Summary of Legal Structure

3.       CWG - Draft Transition Proposal (Sidley Comments)

Best regards,
Lise

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150420/d426581a/attachment.html>