[CWG-Stewardship] [client com] Draft: Summary of Legal Structure for CWG Proposal

[Seun Ojedeji]

Thanks!

Regards

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 21 Apr 2015 12:51, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:

> Seun,
>
> I sent them several hours ago in a Word doc along with the ensuing
> discussion.
>
> Greg
>
> On Tuesday, April 21, 2015, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Greg,
>>
>> Just to remind you that you are yet to forward my comments/questions to
>> client committee. Items 3 to 5 especially requires their response.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> sent from Google nexus 4
>> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>> On 18 Apr 2015 19:20, "Seun Ojedeji" <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> To Client committee,
>>>
>>> Kindly find a few comments/questions below:
>>>
>>> 1. The existing IANA naming functions department, administrative staff
>>> and related resources, processes, data and know-how would be legally
>>> transferred into PTI
>>> I don't think there is "IANA naming function department" but there is
>>> "IANA functions department" So i propose the following:
>>>
>>> The IANA naming functions, related administrative staff and resources,
>>> processes, data and know-how would be legally transferred into PTI from the
>>> exiting "IANA functions department"
>>>
>>> 2. The IANA portion of the ICANN budget would be subject to
>>>
>>> I think it may be useful to be more specific about the IANA budget
>>> referred. So the wording below may be useful:
>>>
>>> The IANA portion of the ICANN budget *related to naming* would be
>>> subject to.......
>>>
>>> 3 .....conducted by a multi-stakeholder body, independent from ICANN
>>>
>>> There is no section of the document that describe what independent in
>>> that statement meant. If it mean independent of ICANN board then it should
>>> be clearly stated.
>>>
>>> 4. The strengths of this proposed structure are as follows:
>>> Isn't item c on also a weakness in practical sense considering that
>>> ICANN is the source of funding of IANA?
>>>
>>> 5. The weaknesses of the proposed structure are as follows:
>>>
>>> I think introduction of new entity/structures creates accountability
>>> concerns which i think should be included as a weakness. Also the running
>>> cost of those structures should be included as a weakness (overall the
>>> end-user bears the cost)
>>> Last but not the list, the overall statement seem to miss mention of the
>>> formation of the charter/bylaw for the PRF?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Client Committee List for CWG <
>>> cwg-client at icann.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>   Dear All,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Attached is a summary of the current legal structure under
>>>> consideration by the CWG.   This also includes the CCWG dependencies.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please let us know if you have any comments or would like to discuss.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Sharon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *SHARON* *FLANAGAN*
>>>> Partner
>>>>
>>>> *Sidley Austin LLP*
>>>> +1.415.772.1271
>>>> sflanagan at sidley.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ****************************************************************************************************
>>>> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
>>>> privileged or confidential.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
>>>> attachments and notify us
>>>> immediately.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ****************************************************************************************************
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Cwg-client mailing list
>>>> Cwg-client at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:
>>> http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt
>>> email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng*
>>>
>>> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>>>
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150421/b33b4d55/attachment.html>