[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - version V3.3

[Marika Konings]

Thanks, Avri, received. And yes, we are working on a glossary.

Best regards,

Marika

From: Avri Doria <avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>>
Organization: Technicalities
Reply-To: Avri Doria <avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>>
Date: Tuesday 21 April 2015 00:43
To: "cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review - version V3.3

Hi,

Marika, apologies for yet another edit.  Do not know it it is too late, but responding to the issues in the current draft.

DT-N worked on both Annex F and Annex L trying to make them consistent.

- Worked of the escalation triggers.
  - CSC + a super-majority of ccNSO and GNSO can trigger the IFR
  - the IFRT can trigger (recommend) a Separation mechanism

- made Annex F & L consistent & non overlapping on triggers

- minor changes to short version (III.A.i.d & III.A.ii.d) for consistency with annex F & L

- put the decisions of the IFR back to Consensus or super-majority.

- removed IETF & RIRs from IFRT

- move trigger to trigger section in F

- changed duration  of  IFR to 9 months

- fixed table to refer to IFR

Made all the edits to the not-clean version.  Hope that was the right thing to do.


Another note that was made to me in my constituency, will we have a glossary of acronyms.
We are very acronym rich.
thanks

avri


On 20-Apr-15 14:50, Marika Konings wrote:
Dear All,

Please find attached an updated draft which now incorporates, amongst others, a summary for section III, DT X, information from the legal memo, updates as a result of comments received and proposed text for section IIIB. Note that we've also reorganised the annexes to match the flow of the document.

Please note that that there a number of comments that have been flagged that need further consideration by the different DTs. We would like to encourage the leads of the DTs to pick up on the items that have been flagged for review and provide feedback on those items to the CWG mailing list as soon as possible.

Also, note that we've incorporated those edits and/or comments that we considered corrections and/or clarifications of existing content as well as responses to some of the Sidley comments. If you do not agree with those responses or updates or are of the view that these are more than corrections and/or clarifications, please flag those accordingly.

You are encouraged to flag any items that you think warrant CWG consideration by Tuesday 20 April at 16.00 UTC at the latest. Other minor edits and/or clarifications can be submitted until Tuesday 20 April 23.59 UTC.

For your convenience I've attached a redline and clean version both in Word as well as pdf.

Thanks again for all your feedback!

Marika



_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship



________________________________
[Avast logo]<http://www.avast.com/>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com<http://www.avast.com/>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150421/99e7b782/attachment.html>