[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - version V3.3

[CW Lists]

I prefer the existing text, unchanged.

CW


On 21 Apr 2015, at 16:47, Brenden Kuerbis <bnkuerbi at syr.edu> wrote:

> Hi Marika,
> 
> The first bullet in Section III.A says:
> 
> ICANN, through an affiliate controlled by ICANN, to continue as the IANA Functions Operator for the Naming Related Services through the creation of a separate legal entity, Post-Transition IANA (PTI).
> 
> Section III.A.i.a, which is text provided by Sidley in consultation with the CWG, says:
> 
> A contract would be entered between PTI and ICANN, which would give PTI the rights and obligations as the IANA Functions Operator. 
> 
> 
> I believe the latter statement is correct, and the prior bullet is inconsistent with it (or at least very unclear). Perhaps Sidley could provide more accurate text for the bullet in Section III.A, or I would suggest:
> 
> Creation of a legally separated affiliate, Post-Transition IANA (PTI), to provide the IANA functions.
> 
> This would be followed by the existing bullets:
> 
> Establishment of service level agreement between ICANN and PTI, the IANA Functions Operator for the Naming Related Services.
> Changes proposed to root zone environment and relationship with root zone maintainer.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- Brenden
> 
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> Please find attached an updated draft which now incorporates, amongst others, a summary for section III, DT X, information from the legal memo, updates as a result of comments received and proposed text for section IIIB. Note that we’ve also reorganised the annexes to match the flow of the document.
> 
> Please note that that there a number of comments that have been flagged that need further consideration by the different DTs. We would like to encourage the leads of the DTs to pick up on the items that have been flagged for review and provide feedback on those items to the CWG mailing list as soon as possible.
> 
> Also, note that we’ve incorporated those edits and/or comments that we considered corrections and/or clarifications of existing content as well as responses to some of the Sidley comments. If you do not agree with those responses or updates or are of the view that these are more than corrections and/or clarifications, please flag those accordingly. 
> 
> You are encouraged to flag any items that you think warrant CWG consideration by Tuesday 20 April at 16.00 UTC at the latest. Other minor edits and/or clarifications can be submitted until Tuesday 20 April 23.59 UTC.
> 
> For your convenience I’ve attached a redline and clean version both in Word as well as pdf.
> 
> Thanks again for all your feedback!
> 
> Marika 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150421/dbf39516/attachment-0001.html>