[CWG-Stewardship] The PTI board

[Milton L Mueller]

You’re right, Seun!
My mistake, thanks for catching it

From: Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 10:57 AM
To: Milton L Mueller
Cc: Alan Greenberg; Greg Shatan; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] The PTI board

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu<mailto:mueller at syr.edu>> wrote:
 The PRF escalation path should go through the PTI board, for example.


Perhaps you meant the CSC and not the PRF as i think PRF (ICANN) is the entity awarding contract to PTI hence PTI is subject to PRF as the contractor. So if there is any escalation to be done as it concerns IANA operations in relations to names, it has to be CSC escalating to PTI.
So PTI will sure need some level of MS. IANA issue escalation that may get to PRF will be those that have been independently filed due to gross miss-conduct/non-performance from PTI as the IANA manager.

Regards


_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship



--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seun Ojedeji,
Federal University Oye-Ekiti
web:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
Mobile: +2348035233535
alt email: <http://goog_1872880453> seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng<mailto:seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>
The key to understanding is humility - my view !

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150421/196c91fe/attachment.html>