[CWG-Stewardship] Anonymity of Comments

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hi Grace,

Thanks for this. I got that clarification during the last minute of the
call; I was one of those who thought its an online form.

I also like the fact that the template is not a replacement for the usual
way of submitting comments.

Regards
PS: On a lighter note, wonder why ICANN PC is called a forum. Doesn't seem
to be my understanding of how forum interactions happen...J

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
wrote:

> Thanks Greg.
>
> I think the question of anonymity was partly due to a confusion about how
> the template would work, so I’ll clarify here in simplified steps.
>
>    - Step 1: download the template (in fillable PDF or Word)
>    - Step 2: enter feedback and general comments
>    - Step 3: save and submit the template as an attachment to the public
>    comment forum (this is an email address) — *NB: The template is not an
>    online form *
>    - Step 4: confirm your comment to the forum (automatic email is
>    generated — this is to prevent spam)
>
> As we noted on the call, the template is a suggestion (strongly
> encouraged) for submission of comments, but it is not the only way to
> submit comments. Any comments submitted to the public comment forum will be
> considered, just as we have done for the past Public Comment. The template
> simply allows for a guide to submitting feedback, and also facilitates
> analysis and incorporation once the public comment period is closed.
>
> Best,
> Grace
>
> From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
> Date: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:15 PM
> To: "cwg-stewardship at icann.org" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Anonymity of Comments
>
> All:
>
> ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior do not allow anonymous comments in
> Public Comment.
>
> To maximize transparency of the consultation process, ICANN will: ...
>
>    - Require that all comments be tagged with the sender's name and any
>    relevant affiliation (where the individual is speaking on behalf of a
>    group). Where the respondent is an ICANN Supporting Organization,
>    Advisory Committee, or constituency group, some indication must be given of
>    the process that was used to develop the comment and the parties who took
>    part in that process.
>
> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2008-01-10-en
>
> Greg Shatan
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------





*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*

The key to understanding is humility - my view !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150421/cc28eed1/attachment-0001.html>