[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - version V3.3

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Wed Apr 22 01:57:06 UTC 2015


Hi,

Sounds right to me as well.

I think any incidental compatibility issues that may spring up become an
issue for the ICG, as long as we remain careful to not include any extra
work or participation by the other operational communities in any of the
PTI mechanisms.

avri

On 21-Apr-15 13:36, Greg Shatan wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> By George, I think you've got it.
>
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Andrew Sullivan
> <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 04:32:40PM +0000, Martin Boyle wrote:
>     > I think that Greg is right, that we were not mandated in the CWG
>     to look at numbers or protocol parameters.  While that might sit
>     uneasily, I’m not sure I really know about the flow of funding or
>     the accountability/stewardship role in the light of Milton’s
>     assertion.
>     >
>
>     I believe here are two completely different things here.
>
>     1.  The IANA functions -- all of them -- move from inside ICANN to the
>     affiliate.  This is how ICANN performs the IANA functions.  The
>     agreements with other parties can remain between ICANN and those
>     other parties, but that does not affect the "how ICANN gets IANA
>     done."
>
>     2.  The names IANA function gets all the accountability rules and so
>     on we've been talking about.  That's the "names community proposal".
>     This part really is names-only.
>
>     If follows from these two premises, however, that ICANN needs also to
>     undertake some sort of agreement with PTI about how the other
>     communities' needs get satisfied.  Presumably, if the other
>     communities maintain an agreement with ICANN, then ICANN concludes an
>     agreement with PTI that says, "You implement that."  The details of
>     how that is worked out, however, are not our problem and we don't need
>     to have an opinion about it reflected in this document, I think.
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     A
>
>     --
>     Andrew Sullivan
>     ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
>     _______________________________________________
>     CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>     CWG-Stewardship at icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150421/df79f42f/attachment.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list