[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - version V3.3

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

On 21-Apr-15 15:24, manning wrote:
> The ONLY open/transparent option is to ask the .INT registrants what they would like to see done going 
> forward.

This makes sense.
I think this has been suggested before.

I certainly have a great deal of trouble suggesting a transition plan
that cements the .int status quo as the solution for ever.  Even if we
do not do this now at the last minute when we put it aside earlier, I
believe we must have a way for the .int registrants to have some say in
their long term future post transition.

avri


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150421/20f66f35/attachment.html>