[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - version V3.3

[Andrew Sullivan]

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 02:16:23AM -0400, Greg Shatan wrote:
> This issue (who makes decisions about or approves "architectural changes to
> the root system" in the absence of the NTIA) bears further review.  The CSC
> doesn't seem like the right place at all.  The PTI Board makes some sense,
> but only if we are not keeping it minimalist.  Could the NTIA role simply
> disappear (as we propose to happen with the authorization/validation
> function)?

Why isn't this the names community within ICANN?  That's where the
policy resides, I thought?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com