[CWG-Stewardship] [client com] CWG Meeting #42: Sidley Proposed Inserts

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

A rough parallel I have in mind.

In US capital cases, there is first a trial to decide on what happened.
this is the IFR.
and then, if necessary, there is another whole trial to figure out what
to do about it. This is the separation mechanism (which may not be
properly named).

avri

On 22-Apr-15 07:06, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This seems to leave out a step from what I thought we were saying
>
> A result of the IFR is that they might make a recommendation that the
> a Separation review occur.
>
> The IFR report undergoes a comment period before it goes to the
> Board,  and depending on the comments &c. the Board may approve.
>
> If they approve the reccomendation for Separation Mechanism, a cross
> community WG, is initiated to take the outcome of the IFR report and
> decide what needs to be done to repsond to the issue discussed in that
> report.  This includes the possiblity of creating an RFP and selcting
> a new operator.  Or it could recommend other remediation methods. This
> would be an arduous process on the order of this CWG efffort.
>
> Like any CWG this group has community input and comment periods.
>
> At the end it submits its recommendation to the Board, which first
> does an comment period.
>
> I may be misreading the content below, but I do not think this.
>
> avri
>
> On 22-Apr-15 02:08, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>> >
>> > An outcome of an IANA Function Review could include a
>> recommendation to initiate a separation of the IANA Functions
>> Operator.  This recommendation would be submitted to the ICANN Board
>> for consideration, with ultimate input by the multistakeholder
>> community through the CCWG Accountability mechanisms under
>> consideration.(1) 
>> >
>> > (1) A point for public comment is whether the IANA Function Review
>> recommendation for separation should first be submitted to the
>> Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees for their approval
>> before escalation to the ICANN Board, or whether the IANA Function
>> Review recommendation for separation should be submitted directly to
>> the ICANN Board by the IANA Function Review Team.
>> >
>> >  
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Avast logo <http://www.avast.com/> 	
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150422/8550ea01/attachment.html>