[CWG-Stewardship] [client com] CWG Meeting #42: Sidley Proposed Inserts

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

A suggested rewording that includes the steps I think were missed.

avri
>
> On 21 Apr 2015 23:O04, "Client Committee List for CWG"
> <cwg-client at icann.org <mailto:cwg-client at icann.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> >  
> >
> > Following up on today’s call, below is proposed language for III. A
> and Annex L.
> >
>
> > Annex L:
> >
> >  
> >
> > Triggers for the Separation Mechanism
> >
> > An outcome of an IANA Function Review could include a recommendation
> to initiate a separation of the IANA Functions Operator.  This
> recommendation would be submitted to the ICANN Board for
> consideration, with ultimate input by the multistakeholder community
> through the CCWG Accountability mechanisms under consideration.(1)

An outcome of an IANA Function Review could include a recommendation to
initiate a  Cross Community Working Group to make specific recommends
that deal with recommendation made by the IFR.  These could include the
creation of an RFP and separation of the IANA Functions Operator.  This
would would be according toa cross community working group chartered by
the Board and its recommendation would be submitted to the ICANN Board
for consideration. The cross community process would include the
collection of community input and intermediate comment periods on the
work, with ultimate input by the multistakeholder community through the
CCWG Accountability mechanisms under consideration.(1)

> >> (1) A point for public comment is whether the IANA Function Review
> recommendation for separation should first be submitted to the
> Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees for their approval
> before escalation to the ICANN Board, or whether the IANA Function
> Review recommendation for separation should be submitted directly to
> the ICANN Board by the IANA Function Review Team.

(1) A point for public comment is whether the IANA Function Review
recommendation for a separation  process should be chartered by the
Board or by the SOAC and whether the recommendations should first be
submitted to the Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees for
their approval before escalation to the ICANN Board. Or whether the
Separation process CWG recommendation for separation should be submitted
directly to the ICANN Board by the IANA Function Review Team.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150422/7e3ca753/attachment.html>