[CWG-Stewardship] [client com] IPR Memo

[Mwendwa Kivuva]

On 10 August 2015 at 09:46, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:

> I also don't think it's accurate to state that failing to embrace the
> CRISP proposal will result in "any of our three community proposals
> having to go back to the community process and seek for re-approval."
>  There's no indication that needs to happen, and stating that it will tends
> to look like an attempt to shove the CWG into accepting the CRISP proposal
> by proposing that some awful thing will happen if we don't. That may not
> have been the intent, but it certainly could be the effect.
>

Certainly, if the numbering community are asked to adopt another stance
than that in their proposal, the community has to be given a chance to
debate and ratify. That is part of the principles NTIA expects us to
follow: Support and enhance the multistakeholder model; and Meet the needs
and expectations of the global customers and partners of the IANA services.

My views alone.

Regards
______________________
Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya

"There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on
higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150810/b0ef8245/attachment.html>