[CWG-Stewardship] CWG Position on IANA IPR
Mueller, Milton L
milton.mueller at pubpolicy.gatech.edu
Thu Aug 27 13:42:10 UTC 2015
> -----Original Message-----
> It does not serve as a rationale for Names for whom the PTI is the IFO and for
> which there is a separation process defined. It therefore cannot be Names'
> rationale.
That's not quite correct, Avri. PTI is a controlled corporate subsidiary of ICANN. Therefore, for separability purposes, taking names IFO away from PTI is also taking it away from ICANN, as I am sure you know.
So nondiscriminatory reassignment of the trademarks and domains _can_ be a rationale here.
> As far as I can tell Names rationale for not leaving it with ICANN and moving it
> to a suitable trust is compromise with the other 2 OCs.
If that is _your_ rationale, it is fine. It works for me, and probably for 2 others. It is not the rationale that the rest of us have been citing.
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list