[CWG-Stewardship] CWG Position on IANA IPR
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Thu Aug 27 14:30:35 UTC 2015
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:27:03AM -0400, Greg Shatan wrote:
> There's no need to inject any other rationale than that, and in any case,
> we have no consensus rationale to inject.
Greg's remark there does seem to raise the question of what difference
it makes what the rationale is. I think I don't understand what the
controversy is: why should we care why the CWG came to its conclusion,
given that the conclusion appears to work out?
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list