[CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Draft Report for Singapore

[Gomes, Chuck]

Alan,

I think the second discussion question you provided has some promise: "A prime target if any IANA implementation is to ensure the stability and security of the DNS> How do you believe that the four proposal options support this need?"  But I think the first one may be premature until we get legal advice and do some more work:  ". For each of the four proposal models, indicate whether you strongly support or reject this proposal, and why."  I think that will be a very good question to ask as part of the next public comment period regarding what options may be proposed then because we will have been able to incorporate the legal advice and hopefully fill in a lot of holes that still exist.

I am very happy to see you proposing questions because in my view that is the main purpose of this exercise and the key task before we can finalize the document.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 6:34 PM
To: Bernard Turcotte; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Draft Report for Singapore

Attached is a copy with a number of comments and suggested questions.  Alan

At 01/02/2015 12:40 PM, Bernard Turcotte wrote:
>All, please find attached the draft report for the Singapore meeting 
>and the updated timeline.
>
>Questions and comments welcome.
>
>Jonathan and Lise would also like input on questions which could be 
>added to this document which would provide useful feedback for our work.
>
>Cheers.
>
>B.