[CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Draft Report for Singapore

[Alan Greenberg]

No problem with this.  Alan

At 02/02/2015 03:20 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>Hi,
>
>One to the comments I would make is that the notion of separability, 
>the ability to remove the IANA function from ICANN without 
>necessarily separating the function from ICANN at this time, is 
>common to both solutions as it is contained in the principles and 
>both solutions allow for this, though in a different manner 
>(contract co vs. so-called nuclear options).  I beleive it should 
>get a point in the " Common points between the two models "
>
>avri
>
>On 02-Feb-15 07:47, Avri Doria wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>On 02-Feb-15 00:07, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>>
>>>The first point you make in this report, which apparently was 
>>>drafted by ICANN staff, is "Overall there was very strong support 
>>>for the current IANA operator (ICANN) and that the IANA functions 
>>>should not be moved from ICANN, or tendered for, at the onset of 
>>>the transition." Taken out of context, this statement makes it 
>>>seem as if there is little support for separability.
>>
>>And yet what is says appears  true as it stands, no mater who wrote it.
>>
>>I think the misapprehension some might get could be fixed by adding 
>>a clause at the begining that says While separability has been 
>>supported as a basic principle of the process, and is supported by 
>>a most of the participants, overal there is ....
>>
>>I was traveling when this came out am still reading the report and 
>>will add my personal views on the report later in the day.  At this 
>>point I should emphasise that these reviews will all be personal 
>>and will not be an NCSG position - I do not think we have time to 
>>reach such a consensus even among the our smaller tracking group in 
>>the next day.  If perchance we do, I will inform the list of that condition.
>>
>>avri
>>
>>
>>avri
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>><mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>_______________________________________________
>CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150202/beeb777a/attachment.html>