[CWG-Stewardship] CWG - DRAFT discussion document for Singapore V3.5

[Seun Ojedeji]

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 3 Feb 2015 02:35, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Bernie.
>
> ·         Regarding “Are your concerned about the actual costs for
operating the IANA functions, for protocols and numbers, given these are
currently funded by ICANN.” – Are don’t think it is accurate to say that
they are currently funded by ICANN; ICANN may fund some costs but a large
part of the RIR and IETF functions are not funded by ICANN.
>
While the RIRs contributes $800k+ annually (there is no clear financial
contribution made by the IETF body), it's not clear how much is spent to
operate numbers functions for instance. So I think the intent of the
question could be to understand whether the community is interested in
knowing the actual cost of operating the respective functions since
everything seem lumped together at the moment.
Whether it's appropriate for the CWG to ask would be another thing to
consider, so perhaps rephrasing the question to refer to names related
function may be helpful. Something similar to below:

" Given that the proposal from respective communities may be different, are
you concerned about knowing the actual costs for operating the IANA
functions related to names"

Regards
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Turcotte
> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 8:13 PM
> To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - DRAFT discussion document for Singapore
V3.5
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> At the request of Lise and Jonathan, given the time-frame is incredibly
short, I am including version 3.5 of the discussion document.
>
>
>
> Based on 3.2 all changes are in track changes and each change has been
attribute via a comment bubble to the person or persons who made the
original comment/request.
>
>
>
> We have also included the questions which were suggested on today's RFP3
call.
>
>
>
> As per Jonathan's request we do need to get this done before heading to
Singapore which for most of us will be mid-day Wednesday of this week. As
such we would appreciate any significant comments by noon UTC of Wednesday
this week at which point we will finalize the document for general
distribution.
>
>
>
> Thank You.
>
>
>
> B.
>
>
>
> Ps clean and track changes version included.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150203/07accf81/attachment-0001.html>