[CWG-Stewardship] CWG - DRAFT discussion document for Singapore V3.5

[Greg Shatan]

I thought the point was that ICANN does not provide any funds *to* IETF and
RIRs for their internal costs (such as they are) relating to IANA processes
(which I assume is primarily policy-related).  By contrast, ICANN funds its
own costs relating to IANA policy-making, as well as funding the IANA
Functions Operator aspect of IANA.  Maybe that's a different point....

Greg

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:25 PM, David Conrad <david.conrad at icann.org>
wrote:

> The point I was making in my message was that ICANN funds all of the IANA
> naming functions but does not fund all of the IETF and RIR costs related to
> IANA processes.
>
> How do you know that?  I thought this was a free service for the IETF.
>
>
> No entity is charged for IANA services.  Really.
>
> I admit I don't know the numbers contribution levels for the IANA service,
> but I am pretty sure IETF pays nothing for it.
>
>
> There are no "contribution levels for IANA services." The IETF does not
> provide any funding to ICANN.  Nor do the .INT registrants. The RIRs and
> some ccTLDs provide a voluntary contribution to ICANN, but that accounts
> for a tiny fraction of ICANN's revenues.
>
> Regards,
> -drc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150203/52cd8907/attachment-0001.html>