[CWG-Stewardship] CWG - DRAFT discussion document for Singapore V3.5

[David Conrad]

Greg,

> I thought the point was that ICANN does not provide any funds to IETF and RIRs for their internal costs (such as they are) relating to IANA processes (which I assume is primarily policy-related).  By contrast, ICANN funds its own costs relating to IANA policy-making, as well as funding the IANA Functions Operator aspect of IANA.

Sorry, what "IANA policy-making" are you talking about?  AFAIK, the vast majority of policy making is related to various gTLD-related issues, with a bit of ccTLD policy thrown in on occasion. There is also tiny bit of numbers-related policy making.  That is, the vast majority of ICANN's resources are spent on stuff that happens before IANA staff gets involved.

Regards,
-drc





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150203/70e7c89b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150203/70e7c89b/signature.asc>