[CWG-Stewardship] CWG - DRAFT discussion document for Singapore V3.5
David Conrad
david.conrad at icann.org
Tue Feb 3 17:45:29 UTC 2015
Greg,
> I thought the point was that ICANN does not provide any funds to IETF and RIRs for their internal costs (such as they are) relating to IANA processes (which I assume is primarily policy-related). By contrast, ICANN funds its own costs relating to IANA policy-making, as well as funding the IANA Functions Operator aspect of IANA.
Sorry, what "IANA policy-making" are you talking about? AFAIK, the vast majority of policy making is related to various gTLD-related issues, with a bit of ccTLD policy thrown in on occasion. There is also tiny bit of numbers-related policy making. That is, the vast majority of ICANN's resources are spent on stuff that happens before IANA staff gets involved.
Regards,
-drc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150203/70e7c89b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150203/70e7c89b/signature.asc>
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list