[CWG-Stewardship] CWG - DRAFT discussion document for Singapore V3.5

[Gomes, Chuck]

I don’t think there is much if any IANA policy making per se.

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 12:29 PM
To: David Conrad
Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - DRAFT discussion document for Singapore V3.5

I thought the point was that ICANN does not provide any funds to IETF and RIRs for their internal costs (such as they are) relating to IANA processes (which I assume is primarily policy-related).  By contrast, ICANN funds its own costs relating to IANA policy-making, as well as funding the IANA Functions Operator aspect of IANA.  Maybe that's a different point....

Greg

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:25 PM, David Conrad <david.conrad at icann.org<mailto:david.conrad at icann.org>> wrote:
The point I was making in my message was that ICANN funds all of the IANA naming functions but does not fund all of the IETF and RIR costs related to IANA processes.
How do you know that?  I thought this was a free service for the IETF.

No entity is charged for IANA services.  Really.

I admit I don't know the numbers contribution levels for the IANA service, but I am pretty sure IETF pays nothing for it.

There are no "contribution levels for IANA services." The IETF does not provide any funding to ICANN.  Nor do the .INT registrants. The RIRs and some ccTLDs provide a voluntary contribution to ICANN, but that accounts for a tiny fraction of ICANN's revenues.

Regards,
-drc


_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150203/a1a89107/attachment-0001.html>