[CWG-Stewardship] CWG - DRAFT discussion document for Singapore V3.5

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hello,

While I have no major issue either way, one rationale for including that
section could be to justify/indicate to the community reason why looking
into other option started latter in the process; somewhat historical
background to how we got to current status quo.
I don't think leaving that line imply that contract co is off the table.
Anyway looks like the document is finalized but will be good to take note
during actual discussion at the meeting.

Regards
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 3 Feb 2015 19:44, "Matthew Shears" <mshears at cdt.org> wrote:

>  I have to disagree.  The second sentence is unnecessary - other options
> are being developed (and Contract Co option is still on the table).  In
> addition to which other options were already being mentioned in the
> Frankfurt meeting.  It should be deleted.
>
> Matthew
>
>
> On 2/3/2015 6:15 PM, Christopher Wilkinson wrote:
>
> Good evening:
>
>  >  Given the results of the public consultation and the surveys the CWG
> should develop alternative transition proposals which should include ICANN
> Internal type solutions.
>     There is not enough support for the Contract Co. option at this time
> to allow the CWG to continue developing only this option.
>
>  With respect to the above paragraph (page 4), I request that the second
> sentence (currently deleted) should be maintained.
>
>  Thankyou
>
>  Christopher Wilkinson
>
>  On 03 Feb 2015, at 02:12, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>  All,
>
>  At the request of Lise and Jonathan, given the time-frame is incredibly
> short, I am including version 3.5 of the discussion document.
>
>  Based on 3.2 all changes are in track changes and each change has been
> attribute via a comment bubble to the person or persons who made the
> original comment/request.
>
>  We have also included the questions which were suggested on today's RFP3
> call.
>
>  As per Jonathan's request we do need to get this done before heading to
> Singapore which for most of us will be mid-day Wednesday of this week. As
> such we would appreciate any significant comments by noon UTC of Wednesday
> this week at which point we will finalize the document for general
> distribution.
>
>  Thank You.
>
>  B.
>
>  Ps clean and track changes version included.
>  <CWG-SingaporeUpdateV3.5clean.docx>
> <CWG-SingaporeUpdateV3.5TrackChanges.docx>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing listCWG-Stewardship at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150203/b906a124/attachment.html>