[CWG-Stewardship] URGENT - Re: CWG Timetable - Best Case Estimate

Tue Feb 3 19:47:23 UTC 2015

We need a URL because there is a URL reference in the Discussion Document.

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Berry Cobb <mail at berrycobb.com> wrote:

> The final version is in the webinar ppt. Not posted to wiki yet.  The last
> attached to this thread is also the last one
>
> Changing planes
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Feb 3, 2015, at 10:26, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Berry or anyone,
>
> Is this the final version and does it have a URL?
>
> If so can I have it ASAP, as in now.
>
> Thanks
>
> B.
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Berry Cobb <mail at berrycobb.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Alissa, ICG Vice Chairs & Colleagues,
>>
>> I sent Jonathan the wrong version, please see the attached timeline for
>> the
>> most recent version.
>>
>> My apologies for the error.
>>
>> Thank you.  B
>>
>> Berry A. Cobb
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers
>> 720.839.5735
>> mail at berrycobb.com
>> @berrycobb
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
>> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 06:27
>> To: Alissa Cooper; Patrik Fältström; Mohamed El Bashir
>> Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
>> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG Timetable - Best Case Estimate
>>
>> Dear Alissa, ICG Vice Chairs & Colleages,
>>
>> Thank-you for this note. We are pleased to be able to now respond in some
>> more detail.
>>
>> Following our collective recognition that the CWG would not be able to
>> respond with a proposal in time to meet the original planned submission of
>> 31 January 2015, we have continued to work hard at making progress. This
>> has
>> involved many areas of concurrent work including re-evaluating the work
>> required to complete a proposal and seeking to clearly understand the key
>> dependencies. In this regard, we would like to draw your attention to a
>> three key points:
>>
>> 1. The number and diversity of participants in the CWG's work necessarily
>> mean that it is time-consuming and complex to take account of these
>> inputs.
>> 2. The number of dependencies which impact the timeline of the CWG's work,
>> not all of which can be effectively or completely managed by ourselves.
>> 3. The inter-relationship with the work of the CCWG on Accountability and
>> the necessary inter-dependence of the work of the CWG and the CCWG.
>>
>> Recognising the above, we have constructed a timeline which seeks to
>> provide
>> a Best Case for the production of a proposal from the CWG. This Best Case
>> seeks to predict the path to production of a final proposal which can be
>> signed off by the chartering organisations and moreover, is correlated
>> with
>> the work of the CCWG on Accountability. This Best Case is includes key
>> areas
>> of work (separated into specific work streams), the use of high intensity
>> periods of work and the potential use of an in person / face-to-face
>> meeting
>> of the CWG. It also highlights where there are key risks to the timetable
>> and the consequent target date. These risks are represented by triangles
>> on
>> the diagram. They include but are not limited to:
>>
>> A. Lack of consensus within the CWG around a specific proposal B. Issues
>> around the duration to acquire legal advice or the specific content of any
>> such advice B. The willingness or ability of the chartering organisations
>> to
>> support the outcome of the work of the CWG
>>
>> Rest assured, we have every intention of producing a proposal, which has
>> the
>> support of the CWG members and the chartering organisations, in a timely
>> fashion and will make best efforts to do so. However, we feel strongly
>> that
>> we need to set expectations about the current timetable and the implicit
>> target it contains in that it contains identified risks and therefore may
>> not be achievable.
>>
>> We trust that this is an effective update and are committed to continuing
>> to
>> work towards a well-supported proposal as well as to keeping you informed
>> of
>> and engaged in our progress to that end.
>>
>> Thank-you for your active involvement and appreciation of our task.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan Robinson & Lise Fuhr
>>
>> Attachment: An representation of the Best Case timetable of work for the
>> CWG
>> correlated with our current understanding of the work of the CWG and with
>> the current timetable of the ICG
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa at cooperw.in]
>> Sent: 16 January 2015 23:16
>> To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
>> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Request from ICG
>>
>> Dear CWG,
>>
>> The ICG has been following the developments in all of the operational
>> communities, including the naming community. We have noted some
>> discussions
>> about the possibility that the CWG might require additional time to
>> complete
>> its response to the ICG RFP beyond its original planned submission date of
>> 30 January 2015. In this regard, the ICG would appreciate receiving the
>> CWG's estimated revised completion date, taking into account appropriate
>> time for community consultation. Please communicate this to the ICG as
>> soon
>> as possible but not later than 31 January 2015. It would also be helpful
>> for
>> you to indicate what you expect the CWG’s major challenges to be to
>> complete
>> your work in a timely fashion and whether ICG coordination can be of
>> assistance.
>>
>> We appreciate the CWG’s continued diligence in working towards target
>> completion dates and we expect to stay in close contact concerning the
>> group’s progress until its work is complete.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alissa Cooper on behalf of the ICG
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150203/19fe4489/attachment-0001.html>