[CWG-Stewardship] CWG - DRAFT discussion document for Singapore V3.5

[Greg Shatan]

The preceding sentence takes care of the "justify/indicate" function, and
was inserted to replace the deleted sentence.  No sections are being
deleted.

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> While I have no major issue either way, one rationale for including that
> section could be to justify/indicate to the community reason why looking
> into other option started latter in the process; somewhat historical
> background to how we got to current status quo.
> I don't think leaving that line imply that contract co is off the table.
> Anyway looks like the document is finalized but will be good to take note
> during actual discussion at the meeting.
>
> Regards
> sent from Google nexus 4
> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> On 3 Feb 2015 19:44, "Matthew Shears" <mshears at cdt.org> wrote:
>
>>  I have to disagree.  The second sentence is unnecessary - other options
>> are being developed (and Contract Co option is still on the table).  In
>> addition to which other options were already being mentioned in the
>> Frankfurt meeting.  It should be deleted.
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>> On 2/3/2015 6:15 PM, Christopher Wilkinson wrote:
>>
>> Good evening:
>>
>>  >  Given the results of the public consultation and the surveys the CWG
>> should develop alternative transition proposals which should include ICANN
>> Internal type solutions.
>>     There is not enough support for the Contract Co. option at this time
>> to allow the CWG to continue developing only this option.
>>
>>  With respect to the above paragraph (page 4), I request that the second
>> sentence (currently deleted) should be maintained.
>>
>>  Thankyou
>>
>>  Christopher Wilkinson
>>
>>  On 03 Feb 2015, at 02:12, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  All,
>>
>>  At the request of Lise and Jonathan, given the time-frame is incredibly
>> short, I am including version 3.5 of the discussion document.
>>
>>  Based on 3.2 all changes are in track changes and each change has been
>> attribute via a comment bubble to the person or persons who made the
>> original comment/request.
>>
>>  We have also included the questions which were suggested on today's
>> RFP3 call.
>>
>>  As per Jonathan's request we do need to get this done before heading to
>> Singapore which for most of us will be mid-day Wednesday of this week. As
>> such we would appreciate any significant comments by noon UTC of Wednesday
>> this week at which point we will finalize the document for general
>> distribution.
>>
>>  Thank You.
>>
>>  B.
>>
>>  Ps clean and track changes version included.
>>  <CWG-SingaporeUpdateV3.5clean.docx>
>> <CWG-SingaporeUpdateV3.5TrackChanges.docx>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing listCWG-Stewardship at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150203/8d3bf8ff/attachment.html>