[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript RFP3 - 02 FEB 21:00 UTC

Grace Abuhamad grace.abuhamad at icann.org
Wed Feb 4 08:39:10 UTC 2015


Hi all, 
Just a quick update to let you know that the action items are either
completed or in progress. Kim Davies will attend the CWG working session and
the Chairs will consider this as they develop the agenda for the meeting.
Best, 
Grace

From:  Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer at icann.org>
Date:  Monday, February 2, 2015 6:16 PM
To:  "cwg-stewardship at icann.org" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject:  [CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript RFP3 - 02 FEB
21:00 UTC

 
Dear all, 
 
The notes, recordings and transcripts for the RFP3 on 02 FEB are available
here: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52232288
 
Action Items
Action: Chat and discussion with Kim Davies on what IANA does (day-to-day)
- Ask Kim to attend CWG session
- Ask Chairs to allocate time on agenda to discuss how IANA works
- Encourage all to attend Wednesday IANA session:
http://singapore52.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-iana
<http://singapore52.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-iana>
- Schedule Kim to be on our call post-SG
 
Notes 2/2: 
Questions-focused meeting!
Strickling questions:
Questions are part of his remarks here:
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/speechtestimony/2015/remarks-assistant-secretary-str
ickling-state-net-conference-1272015
<http://www.ntia.doc.gov/speechtestimony/2015/remarks-assistant-secretary-st
rickling-state-net-conference-1272015>
 
Question 1
·      Yes, it's an over-complication -- Paul Kane
·      Yes, it's an unknown, a risk -- Cheryl Langdon-Orr (ALAC)
·      Any change will have risks, so we need to understand them and
mitigate them -- Avri Doria
·      The lesser risk is potentially the "internal to ICANN" solution --
Donna Austin
·      General agreement that there are risks on both sides (internal /
external)
·      Need for legal counsel -- John Poole
Question 2
This question is about the authorization function
Question 3
Yes, purpose of RFP3b
Question 4
Too early to answer
 
Authorization function
·      Role that NTIA performs needs to be replaced (Donna Austin)
·      In the past, there was no authorization function (Paul Kane)
·      Should be an automated process going forward (Paul Kane)
·      There needs to be some checks & balances for redelegation (Chris
Disspain)
·      Need to be careful with a new entity in charge on authorization
function (litigation risk) (Chris Disspain)
·      New role shouldn't exceed parameters of old role (Greg Shatan)
Action: Chat and discussion with Kim Davies on what IANA does (day-to-day)
- Ask Kim to attend CWG session
- Ask Chairs to allocate time on agenda to discuss how IANA works
- Encourage all to attend Wednesday IANA session:
http://singapore52.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-iana
<http://singapore52.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-iana>
- Schedule Kim to be on our call post-SG
Questions to be added to the draft
·      How walled off is the IANA Function?
·      What level of separability is desirable?
·      Do you want to see this transition happen? why or why not?
·      As the registrants, registrars and registries that pay for the IANA
operation do you care how much it costs?  do you care how much it actually
costs to support the IANA function for protocols and numbers?
·      Are we comfortable with ICANN as policy-maker as the IANA operator
(policy-implementer) without external oversight?
·      We also have to start thinking about how the current ICANN centric
policy making process would work in the event that a new IANA operator were
chosen.  For example, should ICANN determine that there should be another
round of new gTLTDs, how would we ensure that the new operator would accept
this? 
·      how about what does functional separation mean to you?
·      what solution path has not been thought of yet by the CWG?
·  Should the primary customers have a weighted say in which proposal is
acceptable?
 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150204/b489ac2d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150204/b489ac2d/image002-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5097 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150204/b489ac2d/smime-0001.p7s>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list